SARANYA
Monday 12 October 2015
Friday 9 October 2015
ONLINE ASSIGNMENT
ONLINE ASSIGNMENT
TOPIC : REFLECTIVE PRACTITIONER
SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED ON,
DEEPTHY.C 3 OCTOBER 2015
DEPT. OF
PHYSICAL SCIENCE SUBMITTED
BY,
SARANYA KRISHNAN
PHYSICAL SCIENCE
Reg
NO :18214379018
INDEX
TOPIC
|
PAGE NUMBER
|
Introduction
|
4
|
Developing as a reflective practitioner
|
4-5
|
Teacher as a reflective practitioner
|
5-6
|
Conclusion
|
6
|
Reference
|
6
|
INTRODUCTION
Reflective practice is the habitual
and judicious use of communication, knowledge, technical skills, reasoning,
emotions, values and reflection in daily practice for the benefits of the
individuals’ communities being served. Reflective practice can be an important
tool in practice based professional learning settings where individuals
learning from their own professional experiences, rather than from formal
teaching or knowledge transfer, may be the most important source of personal
professional development and improvement.
Every day teachers faces many
challenges ongoing chores of caretaking and clean up, planning and providing
and engaging curriculum, communicating with families and co-workers and
responding to the ever growing pressures for outcomes, assessment and
documentation to demonstrate children’s learning etc. These pressures complete
for teacher’s attention, making it difficult to keep the joy of being with
children at the heart of their work. Reflecting on teaching is frequently cited
as a fundamental practice for personal and professional development. The
process of reflection for teachers begins when they experience difficulty,
troublesome event, or experience that cannot be immediately solved. Reflection
commences when one inquires into his or her belief. It has the potential to
enable to direct their activities with foresight and to plan according to ends
in view.
For reflective teachers, their work
is an ongoing process of closely observing and studying the significance of
children’s unfolding activities. Rather than just following preplanned lessons
and techniques, reflective teachers consider what they know about the children
in their group and about child development theory to better understand and
delight in what happens in the classroom. Reflection allows teachers to make
effective, meaningful decisions about how to respond to and plan for children.
It keeps them excited about their work.
A
reflective teacher must be,
·
Examines his or her own reactions to children
or their actions to understand their source.
·
Is curious about children’s play and
watches it closely.
·
Documents details of children’s
conversations and activities.
·
Take time to study notes and photos to
puzzle out what is significant.
·
Eagerly shares stories about children’s
learning with families and co-workers.
·
Ask co-workers and children’s families
for their insights.
·
Read professional literature to learn
more.
·
Shows children photos and stories of
themselves to hear their views.
·
Change the environment and materials to
encourage new play and learning possibilities.
Developing
as a reflective practitioner
Reflective thinking is a learned
behavior that requires time and practice to develop and improve. Starting this
process during the teacher education process is vital if it is to become a part
of daily routine. Some ways to ensure that a teacher in training, develop the
habits and skills needed to become a reflective practitioner include,
1. Take
the time to reflect on all lessons that we already plan and teach. Keeping a
reflective journal and write the thoughts after each lesson.
2. Video
or audio tape teaching aid will help to check the clarity of explanations and
interaction responses with students. And help to avoid unnecessary repetitions
and the responses of the students. And help to avoid unnecessary repetitions
and the responses of the students. This goal is help to improve teaching in
future lessons.
3. Invite
a colleague to come into your class to collect information about your lesson.
This may be with a simple observation task or through note taking.
4. Student
feedback: Ask the students what they think about what goes on in the classroom.
Their opinion and perceptions can add a different and valuable perspective.
This can be done by simple questionnaires or teaching diaries.
Reflective teaching is a cylindrical process, because one you start to
implement changes, then the reflective and evaluative cycle begins again.
Teacher
as a reflective practitioner
A reflective practitioner is a person who looks back at the work they
do, its process and how it can be improved at regular intervals. This can also
be referred to as a person who reflects on the work they have done.
Characteristics of a teacher who is a reflective
practitioner
1.
Reflective teachers are purposeful and
active: Reflective teachers initiate instruction cognizant of the needs of the
students as expresses through their experiences. Reflective teachers aim
instruction towards actions or convictions that resolve the questions, tensions
and perplexities that initiated the student’s process of inquiry.
2.
Reflective teachers are open to the
individuality of students: Reflective teachers recognize that the social
process of education is also personal and that it cannot be coerced from others
but must be chosen by them.
3.
Reflective teachers are sympathetic to
their interests, needs and insights of students: Reflective teachers enhance
relationships with students by acknowledging student’s capacity as reflective
thinkers. Reflective teachers take seriously student’s problems, hypothesis and
conclusions.
4. Reflective
teachers are patient: Reflective teachers know that bit takes time for ideas to
be developed. Delineated and evaluated.
5. Reflective
teachers are flexible: Reflective teachers allow for divergence and
technological change. They seek to expand operations.
6. Reflective
teachers are tentative: They explore, investigate and grow. They are suspicious
of their own conclusions because they know that they are learners.
7. Reflective
teachers are self-regarding: Reflective teachers take their own reasoning
process as part of their field of inquiry. They are conscious of their own
assumptions, logic, choices, priorities and conclusions.
8. Reflective
teachers look at ends as well as means: Reflective teachers ponder how their
decisions will affect the lives of the children they teach.
CONCLUSION
Remember that changes take time.
Most of us won’t change our teaching. Practice overnight. We have been trying
to implement our ideas for several years and still have the old
show-them-hoe-to-do-it tendencies. Also, we won’t want or need to change
everything about our teaching. Some of what we are doing is working. If a
teacher usually makes effective use of wait time, keep that technique. If we
usually ask students to justify their comments, both right and wrong, continue
to ask. Look for the positive in our teaching. The greatest reward of become a
reflective practitioner is that become aware of how insightful and capable
students were molded. Teaching becomes a positive and rewarding experience from
which we learn every day.
REFERENCES
·
Bruner, J. (1960).The process of
education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
·
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A
restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process
(Rev. Ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.
·
Bracken, M., & Bryan, A. (2010). The
reflective practitioner model as a means of evaluating development education
practice: Post-primary teacher’s self-reflections of “doing” development
education. Monitoring and Evaluation (11), 17-21.
·
Dewey, J., Kilpatrick, W., Hartmann, G.,
& Mel by, E. (1937). The teacher and society. New York: Appleton-Century.
·
Glad well, M. (2008, December 15). Most
likely to succeed. The New Yorker, 16-18.
Sunday 4 October 2015
Large Hadron Collider
The
Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and most powerful particle
collider, the largest, most complex experimental facility ever built, and the
largest single machine in the world.[1] It was built by the European
Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) between 1998 and 2008 in collaboration
with over 10,000 scientists and engineers from over 100 countries, as well as
hundreds of universities and laboratories.[2] It lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres
(17 mi) in circumference, as deep as 175 metres (574 ft) beneath the
France–Switzerland border near Geneva, Switzerland. Its first research run took
place from 30 March 2010 to 13 February 2013 at an initial energy of 3.5
teraelectronvolts (TeV) per beam (7 TeV total), almost 4 times more than the previous
world record for a collider,[3] rising to 4 TeV per beam (8 TeV total) from
2012. On 13 February 2013 the LHC's first run officially ended, and it was shut
down for planned upgrades. 'Test' collisions restarted in the upgraded collider
on 5 April 2015, reaching 6.5 TeV per beam on 20 May 2015 (13 TeV total, the
current world record for particle collisions). Its second research run
commenced on schedule, on 3 June 2015.
Background
The
term hadron refers to composite particles composed of quarks held together by
the strong force (as atoms and molecules are held together by the
electromagnetic force). The best-known hadrons are the baryons protons and
neutrons; hadrons also include mesons such as the pion and kaon, which were
discovered during cosmic ray experiments in the late 1940s and early 1950s.
A
collider is a type of a particle accelerator with two directed beams of
particles. In particle physics colliders are used as a research tool: they
accelerate particles to very high kinetic energies and let them impact other
particles. Analysis of the byproducts of these collisions gives scientists good
evidence of the structure of the subatomic world and the laws of nature
governing it. Many of these byproducts are produced only by high energy
collisions, and they decay after very short periods of time. Thus many of them
are hard or near impossible to study in other ways.
Purpose
Physicists
hope that the LHC will help answer some of the fundamental open questions in
physics, concerning the basic laws governing the interactions and forces among
the elementary objects, the deep structure of space and time, and in particular
the interrelation between quantum mechanics and general relativity, where
current theories and knowledge are unclear or break down altogether. Data is
also needed from high energy particle experiments to suggest which versions of
current scientific models are more likely to be correct – in particular to
choose between the Standard Model and Higgsless models and to validate their
predictions and allow further theoretical development. Many theorists expect
new physics beyond the Standard Model to emerge at the TeV energy level, as the
Standard Model appears to be unsatisfactory. Issues possibly to be explored by
LHC collisions include:
v Are
the masses of elementary particles actually generated by the Higgs mechanism
via electroweak symmetry breaking? It is expected that the collider will either
demonstrate or rule out the existence of the elusive Higgs boson, thereby
allowing physicists to consider whether the Standard Model or its Higgsless
alternatives are more likely to be correct.
v Is
supersymmetry, an extension of the Standard Model and Poincaré symmetry,
realized in nature, implying that all known particles have supersymmetric
partners?
v Are
there extra dimensions, as predicted by various models based on string theory,
and can we detect them?
v What
is the nature of the dark matter that appears to account for 27% of the
mass-energy of the universe?
Other
open questions that may be explored using high energy particle collisions:
v It
is already known that electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force are different
manifestations of a single force called the electroweak force. The LHC may clarify
whether the electroweak force and the strong nuclear force are similarly just
different manifestations of one universal unified force, as predicted by
various Grand Unification Theories.
v Why
is the fourth fundamental force (gravity) so many orders of magnitude weaker
than the other three fundamental forces? See also Hierarchy problem.
v Are
there additional sources of quark flavour mixing, beyond those already present
within the Standard Model?
v Why
are there apparent violations of the symmetry between matter and antimatter?
See also CP violation.
v What
are the nature and properties of quark–gluon plasma, thought to have existed in
the early universe and in certain compact and strange astronomical objects
today? This will be investigated by heavy ion collisions, mainly in ALICE, but
also in CMS and ATLAS. Findings published in 2012 confirmed the phenomenon of
jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions, and was first observed in 2010
Tuesday 23 December 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)